SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49908

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS


DATED: 08-06-2026


CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ


WP No. 18213 of 2026



Dr.E.Sowmiya


W/o.Ashok Kumar


No.74/56


Market Lane


Kalmandapam


Royapuram, Chennai 13.


..Petitioner(s)


Vs


1. The Government Of Tamil Nadu,


Represented by its Secretary,


Health and Family Welfare Department,


Secretariat, Chennai 600009.


2. The Director Of Medical And Rural Health Services,


359, Anna Salai,


Chokkalingam Nagar,


Teynampet,


Chennai 600006.


3. The Director Of Medical Education and Research,


Kilpauk,


Chennai 600010.


4. The Director of Public Health And Preventive Medicine,


Chennai 600006.


5. The Dean,


Government of Kilpauk Medical College,


Chennai 10.


..Respondent(s)



For Petitioner(s): Mr.G.Mageshkumar


For Respondent(s): Mr.J.V.Sakthi Baalakrishnan, Government Advocate

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein 1 to 3 herein either to treat the petitioner’s bond period as completed and consequently direct the 5th respondent herein to return the petitioner’s original certificates and documents collected by the 4th respondent while admitting the petitioner to the post graduate degree in Obstetrics and Gynaecoloy along with her Post Graduate Certificate or to give posting orders appointing the petitioner in any government hospitals preferably at Chennai Chengalpattu or Tiruvallur on the basis of the petitioner’s representation dated 01.09.2025 to serve the bond period of one year in view of the Government Order in G.O.(Ms). No.351 dated 27.10.2023, Health and Family Welfare (MCA-1) Department.

ORDER

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned Government Advocate appearing for respondents would submit that petitioner has been posted in a Government Hospital, Madurandagam.

2. When this Court expressed that since petitioner’s grievance has been redressed, nothing survives for further adjudication, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.

3. Recording the submission and endorsement made by the learned counsel for petitioner, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top