SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49918

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Krishnan Ramasamy, J
Ravikumar – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
WP No. 18822 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R.Raji
For the Respondents: Inthu Karunakaran

A Writ of Mandamus may be issued directing public authorities to consider and dispose of a pending administrative representation within a specified timeframe without expressing opinion on the merits.

Headnote:The case involves a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to compel the consideration of a pending representation regarding the issuance of a free house site patta. The petitioner alleged inaction on the part of the authorities despite a formal request made on 12.03.2026. The Court, without delving into the substantive merits of the claim, determined that the respondent authority should dispose of the pending request in accordance with the law within a specified timeframe. The central issue is whether the Court can issue a direction to a public authority to dispose of a pending administrative representation. The Court applied the established principle that public authorities are duty-bound to consider representations addressed to them and that the writ jurisdiction can be invoked to ensure timely administrative disposal without prejudice to the merits of the claim. The petition was disposed of with a directive to the respondent to consider the representation on merits in accordance with law within eight weeks.

Table of Content
1. mandamus for administrative disposal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)

Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider and pass orders on the petitioners represetnation dated 12.03.2026

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 12.03.2026.

2. Ms.Inthu Karunakaran, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner filed a representation dated 12.03.2026 before the respondent, for issuance of free house site patta. However, the said representation was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

5. In reply, the learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the petitioner’s representation will be disposed of within a period of 8 weeks and hence, she requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

6. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondent and also perused the entire materials available on record.

7. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, this Court directs the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 12.03.2026 and dispose of the same, based on the eligibility of the petitioner, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

10. With the above directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No cost.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top