SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 49983

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.Bharatha Chakravarthy, J
Ksps Natarajan and Co. – Appellant
Versus
State Tax Officer – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.14915 of 2026 | W.M.P(MD)No.11206 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M.N.Bharathi
For the Respondents: R.Parthiban

The High Court may set aside an ex-parte assessment order and remand the matter for fresh adjudication when an assessee establishes sufficient cause for failing to produce documentation for tax-exempt goods, ensuring adherence to the principles of natural justice and fair opportunity.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged an assessment order passed under S.73 of the TNGST Act, 2017, for the assessment year 2021-2022, on the grounds that it was passed ex-parte after the petitioner failed to submit proof of exemption due to personal and business circumstances. The petitioner contended that the goods in question were entirely exempted from tax and that the lack of opportunity to file a reply and supporting documents resulted in a violation of natural justice. The core issue addressed was whether, in the interest of justice, an assessee should be granted a further opportunity to substantiate its claim for tax exemption despite an earlier failure to respond to show-cause notices. The court observed that the petitioner still had the legal standing to file an appeal and that the nature of the claim—concerning entirely tax-exempted goods—warranted a re-examination, thereby relaxing the typical requirement of a pre-deposit. The assessment order and the consequential rectification order were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the respondent authority for fresh consideration while simultaneously ordering the release of any bank account attachments associated with the impugned orders.

Table of Content
1. failure to provide exemption proofs in tax proceedings. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. remand of matter for fresh assessment to ensure fairness. (Para 4 , 5)

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the impugned orders passed by the Respondent in GSTIN No. 33AAAFK9908R1ZR along with Form GST DRC-07 in Reference No. ZD331225281582G Dated 17.12.2025 and consequential rectification order in Reference No. ZD330426180012U dated 21.04.2026 and quash the same as it is in gross violation of principles of natural justice, judicial discipline, is arbitrary, perverse and violative of Articles 14 and 19 (1)(g) of the Constitution and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case and thus render justice.

ORDER

This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 17.12.2025, which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of TNGST Act, 2017 , for the assessment year 2021-2022 and consequential rectification order dated 21.04.2026.

2. Heard Mr.M.N.Bharathi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.R.Parthiban, learned Standing Counsel, who takes notice on behalf of the respondent.

3. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is dealing with exempted goods. The goods are entirely exempted from tax. However, on the ground that the petitioner failed to upload the documents in proof for exemption, the impugned order was passed. It is pleaded that due to the personal and business circumstances, the petitioner missed out the opportunity to reply to the show cause notice and upload the documents.

4.In view thereof, the ex-parte has been passed. In cases of this nature, this Court has been granting an opportunity to the petitioner to once again appear before the authority and place on record the documents in support of their claim. Though normally 25% is ordered to be deposited, in this case, since the petitioner is well within the time of limitation to file an appeal and further goods are entirely exempted from tax, this Court is not not imposing the said condition while remanding the matter back to the respondent authority in view of special and peculiar circumstances.

5.In view thereof, this Writ Petition is ordered on the following terms:

i. The impugned order dated 17.12.2025 and the consequential rectification order dated 21.04.2026 are set aside and the matter is remanded back to the file of the respondent for reconsideration.

ii. The assessee shall appear before the respondent without fail and submit their reply and documents in support of their claim, and it is for the respondent to consider the matter afresh and pass orders in accordance with law.

iii. Since the impugned order of assessment is set aside, any attachment of the bank account made pursuant to the impugned order shall stand raised.

iv. No costs. Consequently the connected miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top