IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY
Tvl. THANIGAI MEDICALS – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCI – Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for records pertaining to impugned order of the 2nd respondent in Ref. No. ZD331225286161N/2021-22 dated 18.12.2025 and quash the same and pass such further or other orders as this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and thus render justice.
For Petitioner :Mr.B.Rooban
For Respondents :Mr.R.Parthiban
Government Standing Counsel
ORDER
This writ petition challenges the impugned order dated 03.11.2025 and 04.11.2025 which is an assessment order passed under Section 73 of the TNGST Act 2017.
2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Standing Counsel representing the revenue.
3. By the impugned orders, the assessment was made ex parte because the petitioner did not utilise the opportunities provided. The discrepancies and grounds on which the assessment order was issued, the dealer’s explanation on merits, and the reasons for not participating in the assessment proceedings are summarised briefly and presented in a table below:
| Discrepancies found/Grounds on which the order is passed | ||
|---|---|---|
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.