Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N.Anand Venkatesh, K.K.Ramakrishnan, JJ
Sebastin Ashok – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeals against conviction in criminal cases. (Para 1 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 2. overview of prosecution case, investigation, and trial proceedings. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 3. summary of rival contentions regarding the reliability of the eyewitness. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 4. critical judicial analysis of evidence and necessity for corroboration. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 5. final outcome and acquittal of the appellants. (Para 46) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by N.ANAND VENKATESH, J.)
1.All these criminal appeals have been filed by A4, A3, A1 and A2 respectively, against the judgment and order passed by the Additional District and Sessions Court, Dindigul, in S.C. No. 122 of 2019 dated25.09.2023, convicting and sentencing the appellants as follows:
The above sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
2. The case of the prosecution is that one Alexraj, who is the brother of A1 eloped with one Geetha Lakshmi, who is the daughter of PW1, in the year 2016. The deceased Dakshinamurthy and, Sakthivel who are the sons of PW1 brough
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
