ORDER

Challenging the impugned judgment and decree passed in RCA No.14 of 2023 by the learned Subordinate Court, Ambattur reversing the judgment and decree passed in RCOP.No.59 of 2016 by the learned District Munsif, Ambattur, the Revision Petitioner/landlord had preferred this Civil Revision Petition.

Before the Rent Controller, the Revision Petitioner, as a landlord initiated the eviction proceedings in RCOP.No.59 of 2016 under Sec.10(2)(v) and 10(3)(a)(iii) of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, and to vacate and deliver vacant possession of the shop in the petition schedule property for developing and continuing his business in his own premises for owner’s occupation and on the ground of nuisance. The respondent appeared in the said petition and submitted their objections. On hearing both sides, the learned Rent Controller has held that the requirement of petition premises for the own use and occupation of the petitioner to develop the stationary business and for that, the Revision Petitioner/landlord needs place to continue his business. Therefore, by relying the ratio laid down by the Supreme Court of India in the vide Appeal No.9941 of 2014 in the case of Bhup