SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 50296

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. M. Subramaniam, N. Senthilkumar, JJ
M. Selvam – Appellant
Versus
Registrar General – Respondent
W.P.No.43 of 2025|W.M.P.Nos.46 and 48 of 2025



A writ petition may be dismissed for default and non-prosecution if the petitioner fails to appear or provide representation despite the matter being specifically listed for dismissal.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India challenging specific proceedings of the second respondent regarding seniority fixation and seeking consequential promotional benefits. The matter was initially posted for hearing on 10.06.2026, where no representation was made, and subsequently, it was adjourned to 12.06.2026 under the caption for dismissal. The court addressed the issue of the absence of the petitioner during proceedings. Finding that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner in the physical court or via videoconferencing despite the matter being listed for dismissal, the court exercised its authority to manage the docket. The writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-prosecution; all connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Table of Content
1. dismissal of petition due to non-appearance of petitioner. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2nd respondent pertaining to proceedings tpLtp/vz;/8613/2023 dated 30.11.2023 and proceedigns vide tpLtp/vz;/851/2024 dated 03.02.2024 and proceedings vide tpLtp/vz;/852/2024 dated 03.02.2024 and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary and non-est in law and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent to refix the seniority of the petitioner in the cadre of Assistant / Bench Clerk Grade-II by including his name in the panel of the year 2023 below the name of his immediate senior N.Sivapriya and grant all other consequential service promotional benefits and monetary benefits within the time stipulated.

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Maheshnath

For Respondents : Ms.B.Poongkhulali, for R1 & R2

R3 to R8 – No representation

*****

O R D E R

[Made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.,]

1. On 10.06.2026, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner and hence, the matter was directed to be listed on 12.06.2026 under the cause list caption 'FOR DISMISSAL'.

2. Today also, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner either in the physical Court or on videoconferencing platform.

3. In view of the above, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default / non prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top