SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 50302

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L. Victoria Gowri, J
Navaneetharaja – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P.Crl.(MD)No.3106 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: R. Alagumani
For the Respondents: D. Rajaboopathy

Where a police enquiry into a complaint has already been completed and closed, the High Court will not grant a writ of mandamus to compel police action, but will grant liberty to the petitioner to file a private complaint before the appropriate court.

Headnote:The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct police authorities to take legal action based on a representation dated 18.04.2026. Article 226 of the Constitution of India was invoked for this purpose. The court examined the status of the complaint and noted that the police had already conducted an enquiry and subsequently closed the case after advising the parties to seek remedy in the appropriate forum. The court addressed the issue of whether a writ of mandamus could be issued despite the police having already concluded their enquiry and closed the complaint. The ratio decidendi rests on the established principle that if a police enquiry has already been concluded and closed, the appropriate remedy is not to pursue a writ of mandamus, but to avail of the procedure of filing a private complaint before a magistrate. The court disposed of the writ petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum by way of a private complaint.

Table of Content
1. petition for direction to initiate police action. (Para 1)
2. inappropriateness of writ of mandamus when police enquiry is closed. (Para 2 , 3)

PRAYER

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent no.1,2 to take appropriate action against the Respondent no.4 on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 18.04.2026 in accordance with law within the time stipulated by this Court.

ORDER

Seeking to direct the respondents no.1,2 to take appropriate action against the Respondent no.4 on the basis of petitioner's representation dated 18.04.2026, this writ petition is filed.

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) submitted that with regard to the complaint received from the petitioner, C.S.R.No.729 of 2025 was issued, enquiry was conducted and the same has been closed on 13.12.2025 advising the parties to approach appropriate forum.

3. Recording the same, this Writ Petition stands disposed of, giving liberty to file a private complaint.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top