Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Sathish Kumar, M. Jothiraman, JJ
K. Muthuvellai – Appellant
Versus
District Collector – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts leading to the present challenge concerning property encroachment pending appeal. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. requirement of conclusive determination of rights before ordering removal of structures. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. final disposal of the writ petition. (Para 5) |
PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for records pertaining to impugned order dated 19.06.2025 in Mu.Mu.A2/4177/2025 issued by the 2nd respondent is illegal and quash the same.
For Petitioner : Mr.A.Arul Jenifer for Mr.K.G.Arunkumar
For R1 to R3 : Mr.S.Venkatesh
Counsel for State
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.)
1. The writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the 2nd respondent / RDO dated 19.06.2025.
2. The petitioner originally filed W.P.No.25239 of 2023 to consider the representation and to cancel the patta issued in favour of the private respondents. Pursuant to the order passed in the said writ petition, the petitioner's representation was considered and patta granted to the private respondents was cancelled by order dated 03.09.2024. Thereafter, the petitioner filed
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
