SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 50340

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mumminen Sudheer Kumar, J
B. Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Secretary To Government – Respondent
W.P(MD) No.9453 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S.Ramsundarvijayraj
For the Respondents: S.Ramanathan, S.Vinayak

The High Court may issue a direction to statutory authorities to consider and dispose of a pending service-related representation within a stipulated time frame without adjudicating the underlying merits of the claim.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, requesting the authorities to grant selection grade pay fixation and annual increments for the years 2020 to 2023 based on a representation dated 20.12.2025. The facts establish that the petitioner, while serving as an Assistant Commissioner, sought benefits related to a previous posting of Administrative Officer/Accounts Officer. The court, noting that the relevant authorities agreed to process the representation, directed the respondents to consider the claim within three months without deliberating on the merits of the case. The primary issue before the court was whether the representation submitted by the petitioner warranted a judicial mandate for disposal. The ratio decidendi rests upon the principle of directing administrative authorities to discharge their statutory duty of considering representations within a reasonable timeframe, without the court pre-judging the merits of the underlying service entitlement. The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the third and fourth respondents to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 20.12.2025 within three months.

Table of Content
1. factual background involving a request for service benefits and pay fixation. (Para 1 , 2)
2. judicial disposal of a writ petition by directing administrative authorities to consider pending representations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)

PRAYER:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of MANDAMUS directing the respondents to grant selection Grade/appropriate pay fixation to the petitioner in the post of Administrative Officer/Accounts officer and grant annual increments for the years 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 and consequently, revise all service and monetary benefits based on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.12.2025.

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed seeking writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to grant selection Grade/appropriate pay fixation to the petitioner in the post of Administrative Officer/Accounts officer and grant annual increments for the years 2020, 2021, 2022 and 2023 and consequently, revise all service and monetary benefits based on the representation of the petitioner dated 20.12.2025.

2. The petitioner has been working as Assistant Commissioner (Accounts) in Thoothukudi Corporation appears to have made a claim for grant of selection grade and consequential pay fixation in the post of Administrative Officer/ Accounts Officer in which, he earlier worked and also for grant of annual increments for the years 2022-2023, while seeking consequential revision of his service and monetary benefits, submitted a representation dated 20.12.2025, to the respondent No.3 through the Commissioner, Thoothukudi Corporation. As the respondent No.3 has not taken any action on the said representation, the petitioner has approached this Court by filing present writ petition.

3. When this matter came up for consideration on an earlier occasion on 08.04.2026, this Court ordered notice to the respondents, accordingly. Mr.S.Vinayak, learned standing counsel entered appearance for respondents 3 and 4 and on instructions, he submitted that the representation dated 20.12.2025 submitted by the petitioner is received by the respondent No.3 and appropriate action would be initiated and consequential orders will be passed after collecting all the information from the Thoothukudi Corporation and from the petitioner.

4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the petitioner also submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish all the information that may be sought by the respondent No.3.

5. In the light of the above, this Court without going into the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of, directing the 3rd and 4th respondents to consider the representation dated 20.12.2025 submitted by the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. No costs.

12.06.2026

Index : Yes / No

NCC : Yes / No

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top