SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 50401

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, J
Perfect Medical Enterprises Pvt Ltd – Appellant
Versus
Assistant Commissioner (ST) – Respondent
WP No. 20885 of 2026 | WMP No. 22547 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K. Suresh Kumar
For the Respondents: Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran

A tax assessment order may be set aside and remanded for fresh consideration when issued in violation of natural justice, provided the taxpayer agrees to pay a portion of the disputed tax as a condition for the remand.

Headnote:The petitioner challenged a tax demand notice issued by the respondent, alleging a breach of the principles of natural justice. The petitioner sought the quashing of the order and a remand for fresh assessment after being granted a personal hearing. The core issue was whether the impugned demand order, issued without adequate opportunity for hearing, violated the principles of natural justice. The court relied on the petitioner's willingness to deposit a portion of the disputed tax as a condition for re-opening the assessment, thereby reasoning that a remand was appropriate to ensure fairness and procedural compliance. The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to remit 25% of the disputed tax demand, upon which the impugned order would be set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration.

Table of Content
1. remand of assessment order based on natural justice and conditional payment. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus to call for Demand ID Order NoZD331225165830K dated 02.03.2026 for Rs.3,72,502/- issued by the 1st respondent received by post on 20.04.2026 and quash the same and to direct the 1st respondent herein to redo the assessment afresh after providing an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioner.

ORDER

A demand notice dated 02.03.2026 is impugned primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice.

2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the respondents.

3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle.

4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the order dated 11.12.2025 and the impugned demand notice are set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand.

5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

11.06.2026

Index: Yes/No

Neutral Citation: Yes/No

mmi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top