SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 50604

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D. Bharathachakravarthy, J
A. Abdul Karim – Appellant
Versus
Registrar, Tamil Nadu Board of Indian Medicine – Respondent
W.P.(MD). No.15338 of 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: M. Francis Xavier
For the Respondents: R. Parthiban

State medical registration boards have the authority to verify the authenticity of educational credentials before granting recognition to practitioners of Indian systems of medicine.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a Writ of Mandamus to compel the respondent to grant registration for the practice of Ayurvedic medicine based on an application dated 18.12.2025. The petitioner, having completed a course in another state, sought to practice within the respondent's jurisdiction. The Court determined that the respondent must conduct an inquiry into the authenticity of the petitioner’s credentials and educational background before passing final orders. The main issue was whether the respondent has the obligation to process and verify the petitioner's application for medical practice registration. The Court reasoned that verification of educational qualifications is a prerequisite for professional recognition. The ratio decidendi emphasizes that while a candidate has a right to be considered for registration, such registration is contingent upon fulfilling regulatory requirements and credential verification. The writ petition is disposed of with directions for the respondent to conduct an inquiry into the petitioner's application, afford a hearing, and pass final orders within four months.

Table of Content
1. requirement of credential verification for medical practice registration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)

ORDER

The writ petition is filed directing the respondent to register and issue registration certificate and ID card to the petitioner based on the application dated 18.12.2025.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a practitioner in respect of Ayurvedic medicine. The petitioner underwent the course in Bihar and successfully completed the same. The petitioner is presently practising at Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner intends to practise in Kanyakumari District and has therefore applied to the respondent for recognition as a practitioner of Indian Systems of Medicine. Since the same has not been granted, the petitioner is before this Court.

3. Per contra, the learned Government Standing Counsel would submit that the petitioner is said to have undergone a course in Bihar. It has to be considered whether course undergone by the petitioner is a recognized course or not. The petitioner has to first produce the original certificate, and only after an enquiry into his credentials is conducted, due orders will be passed.

4. In view thereof, this Writ Petition is disposed of on the following terms:

(i) The petitioner's application dated 18.12.2025 shall be taken up for enquiry by the respondent;

(ii) Due notice of hearing shall be issued to the petitioner;

(iii) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent and produce the credentials as required on behalf of the respondent;

(iv) Thereafter, after due conduct of inquiry, final orders in accordance with law and the rules shall be passed;

(v) The aforesaid exercise shall be completed within a period of four months from the receipt of a web copy of this order.

(vi) No costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top