Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mummineni Sudheer Kumar, J
P. Vanithai – Appellant
Versus
Director of Municipal Administration – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background facts regarding removal from service and subsequent acquittal following a criminal appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. judicial mandate for administrative consideration of service regularisation post-acquittal. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to regularize the period of absence from 13.02.2009 to 24.08.2025 as duty period in accordance with Ruling 9(b) of Fundamental Rule 54 and disburse the monetary benefits along with arrears to the petitioner within the time period stipulated by this Court.
O R D E R
The writ petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondent to regularise the period of absence from 13.02.2009 to 24.08.2025 as duty period, in accordance with Ruling 9(b) of Fundamental Rule 54, and to disburse the consequential monetary benefits along with arrears to the petitioner within a time frame to be stipulated by this Court.
2.The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner, while serving as a Junior Engineer, was convicted in Special Case No.5 of 2014 by judgment dated 30.08.2018. Consequent to the said co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
