IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's online application dated 16.03.2026.
2. Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.
3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, 2/5th portion of the subject property was originally purchased by the petitioner on 29.12.2025. Now, he filed an online application dated 16.03.2026 for sub division of the said property. However, the said application was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.
5. In reply, the learned Government's counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that in this case, the petitioner had purchased the undivided portion of land and hence, the respondent cannot conduct survey and sub-divide the subject property without the consent of joint pattadharars. Further, he would submit that no such consent was obtained and produced by the petitioner before the respondents. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.
6. Heard the learned counsel for
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.