SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 50655

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice KRISHNAN RAMASAMY
RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


ORDER

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner's online application dated 16.03.2026.

2. Mr.M.Guruprasad, learned Government's counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. By consent of the parties, the main petition is taken up for disposal in the stage of admission itself.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, 2/5th portion of the subject property was originally purchased by the petitioner on 29.12.2025. Now, he filed an online application dated 16.03.2026 for sub division of the said property. However, the said application was not at all considered by the respondent till date. Hence, this petition.

5. In reply, the learned Government's counsel appearing for the respondents would submit that in this case, the petitioner had purchased the undivided portion of land and hence, the respondent cannot conduct survey and sub-divide the subject property without the consent of joint pattadharars. Further, he would submit that no such consent was obtained and produced by the petitioner before the respondents. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders.

6. Heard the learned counsel for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top