IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
T.Vinod Kumar, J
T.Meghakumaran – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. summary of facts regarding retirement and delayed pension benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. contentions of parties and the bureaucratic hurdles faced. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 3. court's reasoning on entitlement to interest for delayed retiral benefits. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
For Petitioners : Mr.T.Rajkumar
For Respondents : Mr.C.P.Goutham, GA for R1 to R6.
M/s.Hema Muralikrishnan for R9
No appearance – R7 & R8.
O R D E R
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Gov
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.