2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 56648
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. Saravanan, J
C. Karthikeyan – Appellant
Versus
District Registrar (Audit), Trichy District – Respondent
W.P.(MD) No.18045 of 2026|W.M.P.(MD) No.13362 of 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N. Mohan
For the Respondents: R. Parthiban
Recovery of deficit stamp duty must be conducted following the statutory procedure under Section 33-A or through appropriate proceedings for undervaluation under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, ensuring the party is heard and the Registrar follows legal mandates.
Headnote:The petitioner challenged a notice for payment of deficit stamp duty and registration fees, citing Section 47-AA of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, and the Tamil Nadu Stamp (Constitution of Valuation Committee for Estimation, Publication and Revision of Market Value Guidelines of Properties) Rules, 2010. The petitioner contended that the demand was unilateral and contrary to the statutory mandate. The court noted that recovery of deficit stamp duty is governed by Section 33-A of the Indian Stamp Act, requiring a proper inquiry and a certificate from the District Registrar within three years of registration. The primary issue was whether the second respondent could unilaterally demand deficit stamp duty or if a formal procedure for undervaluation under Section 47-A of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, was required. The court observed that the respondents' claim of undervaluation necessitated the initiation of appropriate legal proceedings rather than a simple demand notice, referring to the reasoning that recovery proceedings must follow the strict letter and spirit of the statute. Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge against unilateral demand for deficit stamp duty based on statutory mandates. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. requirement of formal inquiry and time-bar for recovery under section 33-a. (Para 3) |
| 3. necessity of initiating formal proceedings under section 47-a for cases of undervaluation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. disposal of writ petition with directions for statutory compliance. (Para 6) |
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 15.09.2025 in Letter No.Nil issued by the second respondent and quash the same as illegal.
O R D E R
The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned communication dated 15.09.2025 issued by the second respondent, whereby the petitioner has been called upon to pay the deficit stamp duty of Rs.4,76,260/- and the deficit registration fee of Rs.1,36,615/-.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the second respondent has unilaterally increased the stamp duty payable on the Sale Deed. It is submitted that the same is contrary to the mandate of Section 47-AA of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, which was inserted into the Indian Stamp Act insofar as the State of Tamil Nadu is concerned vide Indian Stamp and Registration (Tamil Nadu Amendment) Act, 2008. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that in this regard the Tamil Nadu Stamp (Constitution of Valuation Committee for Estimation, Publication and Revision of Market Value Guidelines of Properties) Rules, 2010 have been framed.
3. It is further submitted that the issue is no longer res integra and is covered by the decision of the Division Bench of this Court, rendered on 11.06.2026, in M/s.Abdul Kalam Science Farmers, People Security Association and another vs. The Inspector General of Registration (Guideline Value) and others, in W.P.(MD) No.9538 of 2026, wherein, after referring to the above provisions, the Division Bench held as under:
“11.As regards recovery of deficit stamp duty, the matter is governed by Section 33-A of the Indian Stamp Act, which is extracted below:
“33-A. Recovery of deficit stamp duty.-(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section 33 or in any other provisions of this Act, if after the registration of any instrument under the Registration Act, 1908 (Central Act XVI of 1908), it is found that the proper stamp duty payable under this Act in respect of such instrument has not been paid or has been insufficiently paid, such duty or the deficit, as the case may be, may, on a certificate from the Registrar of the district under the Registration Act, 1908 (Central Act XVI of 1908) be recovered from the person liable to pay the duty, as an arrear of land revenue.
Provided that no such certificate shall be granted unless due inquiry is made and such person is given an opportunity of being heard:
Provided further that no such inquiry shall be commenced after the expiry of three years from the date of registration of the instrument. (2) The certificate of the Registrar of the district under subsection(1) shall, subject only to appeal under sub-section(3), be final and shall not be called in question in any court or before any authority. (3) Any person aggrieved by a certificate of the Registrar of the district under subsection (1) may appeal to the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority. Any such appeal shall be preferred within such time, and shall be heard and disposed of in such manner, as may be prescribed."
12. The said provision contemplates that proper when stamp duty payable under this Act has not been paid or has been insufficiently paid, such deficit may on a certificate from the Registrar of the district be recovered. It is also stipulated that before issuance of any such certificate for recovery of deficit duty, a proper enquiry must be conducted by the District Registrar in accordance with law. The said provision also stipulates th