2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 67626
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.Victoria Gowri, J
Monish – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1165 of 2026
For the Appellants/Petitioners: F.Deepak
For the Respondents: D.Rajaboopathy
Vehicles seized during criminal investigations should be released on interim custody to prevent deterioration and loss of value, provided the owner provides sufficient security and undertakes not to misuse the vehicle.
Headnote:The petitioner sought the return of a Komatsu PC 136 Hydraulic Excavator seized under S. 303(2) of BNS and S. 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957, for illegal transportation of river sand. The Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai, had dismissed the petition filed under S. 497 of BNSS. The court found that keeping the vehicle in an open place would lead to deterioration and diminished value, serving no purpose in further custody. The primary issue was whether interim custody of the seized vehicle should be granted to the owner despite the respondent's objection that it might be used for similar offences. The court reasoned that the inevitable deterioration of the vehicle due to exposure to sun and rain outweighs the concerns of the respondent, provided strict conditions are imposed. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the order dated 06.06.2026, passed in Crl.M.P.No.248 of 2026 by the learned Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai, is hereby set aside and the vehicle viz., Komatsu PC 136 Hydraulic Excavator (Hitachi) bearing Chasis No.N523610, is ordered to be returned to the petitioner for interim custody subject to the confiscation proceedings to be taken by the concern Department or by the Court on the following conditions.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grant of interim custody subject to security deposits and strict conditions to prevent misuse. (Para 7) |
ORDER
The Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in
Cr.M.P.No.248 of 2026 in Crime No.33 of 2026 dated 06.06.2026 on the
file of the Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai, dismissing the petition
filed under Section 497 of B.N.S.S.
2. The petitioner claims to be the owner of the Komatsu PC 136
Hydraulic Excavator (Hitachi) bearing Chasis No.N523610. The
respondent police has registered a case in Crime No.33 of 2026 for the
offences under Sections 303(2) of BNS and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals
(Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and seized the above said
vehicle for the illegal transportation of river sand. Thereafter, the
petitioner filed Cr.M.P.No.248 of 2026 for return of vehicle before the
learned Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai, and the same was
dismissed on 06.06.2026.
3. The petitioner preferred this Criminal Revision Petition as
against the order dated 06.06.2026 made in Cr.M.P.No.248 of 2026 on
the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai, and to set
2/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 20/07/2026 10:30:10 am )
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1165 of 2026
aside the same.
4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the
learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.
5. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) appearing
for the respondent submitted that if the vehicle is returned to the
petitioner, there is possibility for the vehicle being used for the
commission of similar offence and objected to grant interim custody of
the vehicle to the petitioner.
6. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit
that the vehicle bearing Chasis No.N523610 is owned by the petitioner
and he was not involved in any such offence as alleged by the respondent
and if the vehicle is kept in open place, the vehicle will get deteriorated
and the value of the vehicle would automatically stand diminished and
that therefore interim custody may be granted to the petitioner.
3/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 20/07/2026 10:30:10 am )
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1165 of 2026
7. Considering the fact that if the vehicle is kept in open place
exposing to sun and rain, the value of the vehicle will be deteriorated and
no purpose will be served in keeping the vehicle in custody, this Court is
inclined to allow the revision and thereby setting aside the impugned
order dated 06.06.2026 passed in Crl.M.P.No.248 of 2026 by the learned
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai.
8. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is allowed and the
order dated 06.06.2026, passed in Crl.M.P.No.248 of 2026 by the learned
Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai, is hereby set aside and the vehicle
viz., Komatsu PC 136 Hydraulic Excavator (Hitachi) bearing Chasis
No.N523610, is ordered to be returned to the petitioner for interim
custody subject to the confiscation proceedings to be taken by the
concern Department or by the Court on the following conditions:-
(a)the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.
1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) as non-refundable to
the credit of Aishwaryam Trust, Indian Bank, Tirunagar
Branch, Madurai, Account No.6639017788, IFSC Code:
IDIB000T032;
4/7
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 20/07/2026 10:30:10 am )
Crl.R.C.(MD)No.1165 of 2026
(b)the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.
4,00,000/- (Rupees Four Lakhs only), with two sureties
for a likesum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial
Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai;
(c)The petitioner shall produce the copy of RC Book of the
vehicle before the learned Judicial Magistrate No. I,
Kuzhithurai. If the original RC Book is in the custody of
the finance company, the petitioner shall produce a
photocopy of the RC Book, along with an affidavit
stating that the original is with the finance company and
a letter from the finance company acknowledging such
custody.
(d)the petitioner shall give an undertaking before