SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Headnote Court Copy Facts Arguments Court observation Judicial Analysis Case Map Category Hierarchy Table of Content
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 70196

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
T.Glement Raja – Appellant
Versus
The Sub Collector – Respondent



##PAGE1## ##PAGE2##

C.R.P(MD)No.1783 of 2026

22. V. Selvaraj

23. C. Thangam

24. K. Rajamohan

25. K. N. Subramanian

26. A. Muthukrishnan

27. C. Arumugam

28. Janakiveeraraj

29. A. Sathyavageeswaram

30. Hari Asaithambi

31. Sankarasubbu

32. B. Banu

33. N. Srinivasan

34. K. Iyyappan

35. K. Narayanan

36. S. Ramanathan

37. A.R. Kuppammal

38. T. Mary Glory

39. Chockalingam

40. N. Selvakumar

41. E. Usha

42. S. Nambi Srinivasan

43. Esakkimuthu

44. Muthukrishnan

45. Narayanan

46. Iyyappan

47. Vijayaramasubbulakshmi

48. Muthiah

49. Sankarakrishnan

50. Radhakrishnan

51. Palai Engineering Association

D.No.481, High Ground,

E.B Mill, Palayamkottai.

52. P. Vijayakumar

53. M. Padhmanabhan

54. Assistant Commissioner,

Palayamkottai Municipality

Tirunelveli.

55. G. Muthiah

56. B. Sivakami

57. Sooriyakumari

58. C. Ayyadurai

2/9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/07/2026 09:24:46 pm )

##PAGE3##

C.R.P(MD)No.1783 of 2026

59. K. Balakrishnan

60. Sri Padmanabhan

61. S. Ganesan

62. S. Savarimuthu

63. M. Deivasigamani

64. K. Edward

65. S. Jeyaseelan

66. Duis Angel Quili

67. T. Sundararajan

68. N. Jeya Gopal

69. M. Radhakrishnan

70. V. Selvaraj

71. A. Madhudoodhanan

72. M.M. Muthukutti

73. A.S. Nambirajan

74. G. Neelakanda Pillai

75. A. Subramanian

76. S. Kolappa Pillai

77. Navalakshmi

78. A. Dhakshinamoorty

79. G. Raja Gopal

80. A. Desingurajan

81. S. Ayyappan

rep. through Guardian of

Vijayaransa Subbulakshini

E2, Yadhava 1st Street, Kulavanigarpuram,

Tirunelveli.

82. M. Subburaman

83. S. Gangadharan

84. A. Kannimmal

85. A. Sulochana

86. Muthu Samy Pandian

87. T. Lalitha

88. N. Karmegam

89. K. Pappasamy

90. M. Murugan

91. Varalakshmi

92. Seenivasan

93. V. Esakkimuthu

94. Tamilnadu Civil Supply Corporation

No.85, Tirunelveli.

95. S. Muthukrishnan ... Respondents

3/9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/07/2026 09:24:46 pm )

##PAGE4##

C.R.P(MD)No.1783 of 2026

PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of

Constitution of India, to call for the records relating to L.A.O.P. No. 22

of 2020 pending on the file of the Principal Sub Court, Tirunelveli, to

strike off the same as being without jurisdiction and an abuse of

process of law. Consequently, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to

direct the 1st respondent to determine the compensation in

accordance with the provisions of the Right to Fair Compensation and

Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement

Act, 2013, and to make a reference under Section 64 of the said Act,

2013.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.John

For Respondents : Mr.L.Siva

Govt. Advocate (civil side) for R1

* * * * *

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to strike off a

reference made under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act in

L.A.O.P. No.22 of 2020 pending on the file of the Principal Sub Court,

Tirunelveli.

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the

petitioner's land was acquired for the purpose of a Housing Board

4/9

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 24/07/2026 09:24:46 pm )

##PAGE5##

C.R.P(MD)No.1783 of 2026

Scheme. Though the acquisition proceedings were initiated in the year

1989, the compensation has not been paid till date. In such

circumstances, according to the learned counsel, the reference made

by the Land Acquisition Officer under Section 30 of the Land

Acquisition Act, 1894, is untenable and the reference should have

been made under Section 64 of the Right to Fair Compensation and

Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement

Act, 2013. Therefore, according to the learned counsel, the reference

made under the old Act is liable to be strike off from the file.

3.It is seen from the typed set of papers that the notification

under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was issued on

30.08.1989 and the declaration under Section 6 was made on

01.10.1990. The award came to be passed on 04.06.2001. It is also

evident from the records that the possession of the acquired lands was

taken from the petitioner and the other landowners in the year 2001.

As per the law settled by the Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the d

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top