2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 70941
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
V.Dharmarajan – Appellant
Versus
V.Nachammal – Respondent
##PAGE1## ##PAGE2##
C.M.A(MD)No.1260 of 2025
8.P.Santhiya,
D/o.Late.Palaniappan.
9.K.V.Ramesh,
S/o.Late.Velayutham.
10.Maheswari,
D/o.Late.Velayutham.
11.Karur Vysya Bank Limited,
Rep.by its Managing Director,
Having registered office at No.20, Erode Road,
Vadivel Nagar L.N.S., Karur – 639 002.
12.State Bank of India,
Rep.by its Managing Director,
Having Corporate Centre,
State Bank Bhavan, Madame Cama Road,
Mumbai 400 021. : Respondents
PRAYER:- Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 384 of the
India Successions Act, against the order, dated 26.06.2025 made in
Succession O.P.No.59 of 2024 on the file of the District and Sessions Court,
Karur.
For Appellant : Mr.V.Nagarajan,
For Respondents : Mr.S.Anwar Sameem, for R2.
: Mr.Madhan Alexander, for R11.
: No Appearance, for R1 to R10.
2/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/07/2026 06:19:19 pm )
##PAGE3##C.M.A(MD)No.1260 of 2025
J U D G M E N T
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is directed against the order passed
in Succession O.P.No.59 of 2024, dated 26.06.2025 on the file of the
District and Sessions Court, Karur.
2. The appellant is the petitioner and he filed the petition under
Sections 373, 374 and 375 of Indian Succession Act, seeking orders to issue
succession certificate in his favour in respect of the shares standing in the
name of his father K.Velaytham, held in respondents 11 and 12 Banks.
3. The relationship not in dispute is that 1st respondent is the wife,
that the deceased K.V.Kumarasamy, deceased Palaniappan, 5th and 9th
respondents and the petitioner are the sons and that the 10th respondent is
the daughter of the deceased Velayutham. The second respondent is the wife
and the respondents 3 and 4 are the sons of the deceased K.V.Kumarasamy.
The 6th respondent is the wife and the respondents 7 and 8 are the daughters
of the deceased Palaniappan.
3/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/07/2026 06:19:19 pm )
##PAGE4##C.M.A(MD)No.1260 of 2025
4. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner and the respondents
1 to 10 are the legal heirs of the deceased Velayutham; that the said
Velayutham died intestate on 15.07.2018 leaving behind his wife, five sons
and a daughter as his legal heirs to succeed his estate; that subsequently,
Kumarasamy and Palaniappan sons of the Velayutham died leaving behind
the respondents 1 to 4 and the respondents 1, 6 to 8 respectively as their
legal heirs; that the petitioner has recently found two original share
certificates and dividend warrant issued by the 11th respondent company
and two original share certificates warrant issued by the 12th respondent
company in the name of the deceased Velayutham and through which, they
came to know that the said Velayutham had purchased 52,214 shares from
the 11th respondent and 1,300 shares from the 12th respondent; that the
petitioner immediately applied for the transmission of shares to one
authorised and registered share dealer Link Intime India Private limited,
who replied through e-mail, dated 13.01.2024, directing the petitioner to
obtain Succession certificate from the competent Court for transferring the
shares from the name of the said Velayutham to his legal heirs; that the
respondents 1 to 10 have no objection to issue the Succession certificate in
4/9
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ( Uploaded on: 23/07/2026 06:19:19 pm )
##PAGE5##C.M.A(MD)No.1260 of 2025
favour of the petitioner for transferring the shares standing in the name of
the said Velayutham and that therefore, the petitioner was constrained to file
the above petition for issuance of Succession certificate.
5. The respondents 11 and 12 filed separate counter statements
raising formal objections. Despite receipt of notice, the respondents 1 and
10 had remained ex-parte. During enquiry, the petitioner examined himself
as P.W.1 and exhibited 15 documents as Ex.P.1 to Ex.P.15. The learned
Sessions Judge, upon considering the pleadings and evidence adduced, has
passed the impugned order, dated 26.06.2025, directing for issuance of
succession certificate to the pet