SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 83582

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. Dhandapani, N. Dilip Kumar, JJ
State of Tamil Nadu – Appellant
Versus
R. Jeya Sheela – Respondent
W.A(MD)No.1619 of 2021|CMP (MD) No.7003 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G. Mohan Kumar
For the Respondents: K. Ragatheesh Kumar

The writ appeal was dismissed as the prayer sought by the appellants had become infructuous, rendering the matter unfit for further adjudication.

Headnote:(A) Writ Appeal - Infructuous - When the prayer sought for in the appeal becomes infructuous, the appeal is liable to be dismissed. (Para 1, 2)

Issues: Whether the writ appeal has become infructuous.

Prayer:This Writ Appeal is filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent Act, against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD)No. 13613 of 2018 dated 01.03.2021.

JUDGMENT

(Judgment of the Court was made by M.DHANDAPANI.J.)

1.When the matter came up for hearing, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the appellants submitted that the prayer sought for in this writ appeal has become infructuous and therefore, nothing further survives for adjudication in the present writ appeal.

2. Recording the said submission, this writ appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top