Back
2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 84503
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. Dhandapani, N. Dilip Kumar, JJ
Gunasekarapandian – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Ramanathapuram District – Respondent
W.P.(MD)No.9243 of 2022|W.M.P.(MD).Nos.6606 to 6608 of 2022
For the Appellants/Petitioners: S. Rajasekar
For the Respondents: M. Mahaboob Athiff
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous following the submission by the petitioners' counsel that the matter no longer required adjudication.
Headnote:(A) Writ Jurisdiction - Infructuous Proceedings - Where the counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous, the petition is dismissed as nothing survives for further adjudication.
Issues: Whether the writ petition survives for further adjudication.
Prayer:This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records pertaining to the impugned order in Na.Ka.B.7/2214/2022 on the file of the Respondent No.2 quash the same as illegal ad consequently direct the Respondents No.1 to conduct an auction for removing the Seemai Karuvelam ( Proposis julifors ) tress in the banks of Kiruthumaal river, Abiramam village, Kamudhi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District within the time frame stipulated by this Honble Court
For Petitioners : Mr.S.Rajasekar, for M/s.T.Lajapathi Roy and Associates
For R-1, R-2 & R-4 : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff, Special Government Pleader
For R-3 : No Appearance
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by
M.DHANDAPANI.J.)
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the matter has now become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for further adjudication in this writ petition.
2. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
