HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J
D.Chandrakrishnan – Appellant
Versus
M.Sitambalam Jeyasingh – Respondent
CRL OP(MD)/663/2022
High Court has the power to ensure proper and expeditious disposal of cases under Section 483 of CrPC.
Headnote:
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE - SECTION 482 - DELAY IN RECORDING SWORN STATEMENT - COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 138 OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT - COURT DIRECTED TO EXPEDITE PROCEEDINGS
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed a private complaint under Section 200 of CrPC to prosecute the respondent for having committed the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The complaint was filed on 30.09.2019. Till date, even sworn statement of the complainant has not been taken. The cognizance of the offence is yet to be taken.
Finding of the Court:
The court expressed surprise that the sworn statement has not been taken so far and noted that the post of Judicial Magistrate (Fast Track Court) meant to handle cheque dishonor cases is vacant for the last two years. As a result, hundreds of cheque dishonor complaints have not even been numbered or taken on file.
Issues: Delay in recording sworn statement in a complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
Ratio Decidendi: Under Section 483 of CrPC, High Court has the duty to ensure proper and expeditious disposal of cases.
Final Decision: The court directed the In-charge Magistrate to take the petitioner's sworn statement on 28.01.2022, which is said to be the next hearing date.
Crl.O.P(MD)No.663 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 12.01.2022
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
Crl.O.P(MD)No.663 of 2022
D.Chandrakrishnan
through his Power of Attorney
D.Mariyappan
S/o.D.Mariyappan
... Petitioner
Vs.
M.Sitambalam Jeyasingh
... Respondent
Prayer: This Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482
of Cr.P.C., to direct the learned Judicial Magistrate/Fast Track
Court (Magisterial Level) in charge Principal District Munsif,
Tuticorin, Tuticorin District to expedite proceedings to record the
sworn statement of the petitioner filed in Cr.M.P.No.4315 of 2019 on
the file of the Judicial Magistrate/Fast Track Court (Magisterial
Level), Tuticorin, Tuticorin District within and to take cognizance
if in order within a specific period.
For Petitioner
: Mr.KA.Raamakrishnan
O R D E R
The petitioner filed a private complaint under Section 200 of
CrPC to prosecute the respondent herein for having committed the
offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act.
2.The complaint was filed on 30.09.2019. Till date, even sworn
statement of the complainant has not been taken. The cognizance of
the offence is yet to be taken. To direct the Court below to record
the sworn statement in Cr.M.P.No.4315 of 2019, this criminal
original petition came to be filed.
3.Expressing my surprise, I called upon the learned counsel for
the petitioner as to why the sworn statement has not been taken
sofar. He submitted that the post of Judicial Magistrate (Fast
Track Court) meant to handle cheque dishonor cases is vacant for the
last two years. As a result, hundreds of cheque dishonor complaints
have not even been numbered or taken on file. In my view, this is
not an acceptable state of affairs. Under Section 483 of CrPC, High
Court has the duty to ensure proper and expeditious disposal of
cases. The In-charge Magistrate is therefore directed to take the
1/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Crl.O.P(MD)No.663 of 2022
petitioner's sworn statement on 28.01.2022, which is said to be the
next hearing date. The In-charge Magistrate should not be under the
impression that their job only to assign dates.
4.This criminal original petition is allowed accordingly.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar (AE)
// True Copy //
/ /2022
Sub Assistant Registrar(CS)
ias
Note :In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a
web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but,
ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct
copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant
concerned.
To:
1.The Judicial Magistrate/Fast Track Court (Magisterial Level)
In charge Principal District Munsif,
Tuticorin, Tuticorin District.
2.The Additional Public Prosecutor,
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court,
Madurai.
COPY TO:
The Registrar (Judicial),
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
(The Registrar (Judicial) is directed to draw the
attention of the Hon'ble Administrative Judge
about the grievance expressed by the Tuticorin Bar)
Crl.O.P(MD)No.663 of 2022
12.01.2022
NSN(CO)
GC(24.01.2022) 2P 4C
2/2
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/