SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 86220

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
M. Dhandapani, N. Dilip Kumar, JJ
V. Seetharaman – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.27428 of 2022|W.M.P.(MD).Nos.21523 of 2022|W.M.P.(MD).Nos.21525 of 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: K.P.S. Palnivel Rajan
For the Respondents: Mahaboob Athiff, R. Karunanidhi, I. Murugesan, S. Vinayak

The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn following a request and endorsement by the counsel for the petitioner.

Headnote:(Withdrawal of Petition) - Writ Jurisdiction - Petitioner seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition, resulting in the dismissal of the petition as withdrawn. (Para 2)

Issues: Whether the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ petition.

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records of the impugned order in S.H.R.C.No. 10463 of 2016, dated 14.03.2022 passed by the second respondent and quash thesame.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.P.S.Palnivel Rajan

For R-1 : Mr.Mahaboob Athiff, Special Government Pleader

For R-2 : Mr.R.Karunanidhi

For R-3 : Mr.I.Murugesan, Counsel for State of Tamil Nadu

For R-4 : Mr.S.Vinayak

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by M.DHANDAPANI.J.)

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition and he has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

2. In view of the above, this writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top