HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENT AND FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER – Respondent
WP(MD) 532/2022
['M/S PARTHASARATHY K J ADDL T/S', '', 'RAJESWARAN K', 'M/S DILIPKUMAR N SSC']
W.P.(MD).No.532 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 14.07.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR
W.P.(MD).No.532 of 2022
and
W.M.P.(MD).No.409 of 2022
M/s.Cholamandalam Investment
and Finance Company Limited
Represented by its Authorised Signatory.
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Principal Commissioner,
Income Tax Department,
No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nadar Road,
Bibikulam,
Madurai – 625 002.
2.The Assistant Commissioner,
Income Tax Department,
Central Circle 2 Madurai,
Kulamangalam Main Road,
Meenambalpuram,
Madurai – 625 002.
3.The Joint Commissioner,
Office of Additional / Joint Commissioner
of Income Tax Department,
No.19A, WGC,
Tuticorin – 628 001.
1/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD).No.532 of 2022
4.Tax Recovery Officer
TRO 1 Madurai,
Income Tax Office – Madurai MA,
No.2, V.P.Rathinasamy Nagar Road,
C.R. Building, Bibikulam,
Madurai – 625 002.
...Respondents
Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the
records pertaining to the order dated 02.11.2021 in TRC.
No.672/TRO/MDU/2021-22 by the fourth respondent quash the same and
consequently direct the fourth respondent to raise the order of attachments
dated 20.03.2017, 09.10.2017, 06.12.2017 and 09.07.2018 on the Mortgaged
Property / Secured Asset being Door No.205 and 205A in T.S.No.332/3 part in
Ward No.35, Block No.9, George Road, Tuticorin.
For Petitioner
: Mr.K.J.Parthasarathy
For Respondents
: Mr.N.Dilip Kumar,
Standing Counsel.
ORDER
The petitioner herein, who is the Cholamandalam Investment and
Finance Company Limited, has filed this Writ Petition to quash the order
passed by the fourth respondent dated 02.11.2021 and consequently direct the
fourth respondent to raise the order of attachments dated 20.03.2017,
2/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD).No.532 of 2022
09.10.2017, 06.12.2017 and 09.07.2018 on the Mortgaged Property / Secured
Asset being Door Nos.205 and 205A in T.S.No.332/3 part in Ward No.35,
Block No.9, George Road, Tuticorin.
2. The petitioner is a non-banking finance company registered under the
Companies Act, 1956 and notified as a financial institution under the
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of
Security Interest Act, 2002. The petitioner is a secured creditor and the subject
property being Door Nos.205 and 205A in T.S.No.332/3 part in Ward No.35,
Block No.9, George Road, Tuticorin is the secured asset of the petitioner. The
borrowers, R.Thanabalan (Sri Sivasankar Timber and Tiles) and T.Sathish
Kumar (Sivasankar Traders) had availed loan of Rs.2,30,00,000/- executed loan
agreement dated 29.01.2015, agreeing to repay the said sum in 122 and 104
EMIs of Rs.1,44,661/- and Rs.3,50,231/-. The borrowers had availed loan
under variable rate of interest. At the time of sanction, it was 13.50% and the
present rate of interest is 14.15%. The borrowers had also created equitable
mortgage over the secured asset by deposit of title deeds on 19.02.2015
registered as Document No.190/2015 in the office of the Sub Registrar,
Tuticorin Joint II.
3/14
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
W.P.(MD).No.532 of 2022
3. As per the loan agreement, if there is any default in EMI, the loan
would be declared as NPA. In this case, the borrowers had defaulted and their
loan account declared as NPA on 05.08.2016. As secured creditor, the
petitioner initiated recovery proceedings under the provisions of SARFAESI
Act by causing demand notice, under Section 13(2) of the Act, dated
30.09.2016, calling upon the borrowers to discharge the debt within 60 days.
This notice was duly served on the borrowers on 10.10.2016. The borrowers
failed to comply with the demand made in 13(2) notice