1

`Suppl. 1, Item No. 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

Cril. Rev. P. No. 20 of 2023

Athokpam Kajit @ Kishorjit and 2 Others

Petitioners

Vs.

National Investigation Agency (NIA), New Delhi and Another

Respondents

BEFORE

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

23.11.2023

[1]

Mr. N. Jonny Meetei, learned counsel, appears on behalf of the

revision petitioners and Mr. Kh. Samarjit, learned DSGI, appears on behalf of

the respondents.

[2]

The present petition has been filed praying as follows :

“In the premises aforementioned, it is, most

respectfully prayed that Your Lordships may most

graciously be pleased to :

(i)

admit the Revision Petition;

(ii)

call all the connected records from the court

below Hon’ble Special Judge (NIA), Manipur;

(iii)

quashing and setting aside the impugned order

dated 24/10/2023, passed in Cril. Misc. Case No.

199 of 2023, [Ref:- FIR No. 1234 (9) 2023 PRT-

PS in c/w NIA Case No. RC-23/2023/NIA/DLI, U/s

120B/121A/122 IPC, 18/18B/39 UA(P) Act] by

the Hon’ble Special Judge (NIA), Manipur;

(iv)

to pass an interim order for allowing the

petitioners to appear through the medium of

electronic

video

linkage/video

conferencing

SHAMURAILATPA

M SUSHIL SHARMA

Digitally signed by

SHAMURAILATPAM SUSHIL

SHARMA

Date: 2023.11.24 13:03:58 +05'30'

2

mode before the Hon’ble Special NIA Court,

Patiala House Court at New Delhi, during

pendency of the case;

(v)

to pass an interim stayed of the impugned order

dated 24/10/2023, passed in Cril. Misc. Case No.

199 of 2023, [Ref:- FIR No. 1234 (9) 2023 PRT-

PS in c/w NIA Case No. RC-23/2023/NIA/DLI, U/s

120B/121A/122 IPC, 18/18B/39 UA(P) Act] by

the Hon’ble Special Judge (NIA), Manipur during

pendency of the case;

(vi)

any other order or direction, which the Hon’ble

High Court deems fit, proper and just in the

nature of the present case.

AND

(vii) award cost of this petition.”

[3]

After some argument and in view of the express provision of

Section 21 of the NIA Act, 2008, Mr. N. Jonny Meetei, learned counsel,

appearing on behalf of the revision petitioners seeks leave to withdraw this

Criminal Revision Petition with liberty to initiate appropriate proceeding in

accordance with law.

[4]

Leave and liberty granted.

[5]

Criminal Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn and

disposed of.

CHIEF JUSTICE

Sushil