SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(MANIPUR) 142

HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
OKRAM HENRY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THANGJAM ARUNKUMAR AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent
MC(El.Pet.) 32 2023



Item No. 14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

MC(El.Pet.) No. 32 of 2023

[Ref:- El.Pet. No. 1 of 2022]

Okram Henry Singh

…..Applicant/s

- Versus –

Thangjam Arunkumar & 2 Ors.

.......Respondent/s

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH

25.04.2023

[1]

Heard Mr. Ajoy Pebam, learned counsel appearing for the

applicant, Mr. HS.

Paonam, learned

senior

counsel

assisted

by

Ms.

Malemleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. A.

Priyokumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 and Mrs. L.

Ayangleima, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3.

[2]

The present application had been filed with a prayer for framing

additional issues as proposed in Para 5 of the present application. This Court

has already framed several issues on 18.04.2023.

[3]

The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that through

inadvertence, he has failed to suggest the proposed additional issues while

framing the earlier issues and accordingly, the learned counsel prays for

allowing framing of the additional issues.

[4]

The learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted

that they have no objection in framing the said additional issues. In view of

the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the

following additional issues are framed for adjudication:-

LHAINEI

CHONG

HAOKIP

Digitally signed

by

LHAINEICHONG

HAOKIP

Date: 2023.04.25

13:40:47 +05'30'

(i)

Whether the Form 26 Affidavit dated 7/02/2022 of

the Respondent No. 1 is in correct format?

(ii)

Whether the Respondent No. 1 failed to disclose

loan overdue of Rs. 2,62,750 (Rupees two lakhs sixty-two

thousand seven hundred and fifty) of his spouse to Axis Bank,

Imphal Branch being A/C No. 916010075728945 in the

relevant column of Para No 8 of his Form 26 Affidavit dated

07/02/2022?

(iii) Whether the Respondent No. 1 falsely filled up as “Not

Applicable” in the Column of ‘PAN’ of his Dependent- 1 and 2

of Part B Para No. 11 of his Form 26 Affidavit dated

7/02/2022?”

[5]

The present misc. application is accordingly allowed.

JUDGE

Lhaineichong

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top