2023 Supreme(Online)(MANIPUR) 226
HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
MINGTHING HORAM – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER – Respondent
WP(C) 106 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
WP(C) No. 106 of 2023
Mingthing Horam
… Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India & anr.
… Respondents
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH
23-02-2023
Heard Mr. Y. Nirmolchand, learned senior counsel assisted by
Mr. U. Augusta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Boboy
Potsangbam, learned CGSC appearing for the respondents.
At the outset, the learned senior counsel appearing for the
petitioner draw the attention of this court to para. 2 of the reply affidavit filed
by the respondents to the additional affidavit filed by the petitioner and
submitted that the petitioner is agreeable to the terms and conditions
mentioned by the respondents in the said paragraph and the present writ
petition can be disposed of with a rider that the whole process about
quantification of the liabilities due payable by the petitioner may be
completed within a stipulated period.
Mr. Boboy Potsangbam, learned CGSC also submitted that if the
petitioner promptly comply with the terms and conditions mentioned in the
said para 2, the authorities will have no difficulty in expediting the matter
and that as mentioned in the said para, the respondents will unfreeze the
Bank account of the petitioner once the quantification process is over and
the petitioner made the payment, if he is liable to pay such taxes. For ready
reference, the contents of the aforesaid para 2 is reproduced hereunder:-
“2. That in reference to para no. 2, the answering respondents’
state that the present investigation involves a huge quantum
of GST evasion by way of non-declaration and utilization of
ineligible input tax credit. The petitioner by his action led the
department to incur huge losses in terms of revenue.
Estimated GST evasion by the petitioner is to the tune of
more than Rs. 8 crores. So far the petitioner has not
cooperated in the investigation by non-appearance on
summons and non-submission of requisite documents. His
actions of non-cooperation, non-submission of statutory
documents and considering the quantum of revenue
involved, led the respondents’ to invoke Section 83 and issue
IN. 84
SHOUGRA
KPAM
DEVANAN
DA SINGH
Digitally signed
by
SHOUGRAKPAM
DEVANANDA
SINGH
Date: 2023.02.23
15:25:51 +05'30'
Order of Provisional attachment. This Honourable court may
give directions to the petitioner to submit all the requisite
documents to the respondents’ within one week and
cooperate in the investigation. Also, the petitioner may be
directed to make complete payment of tax liabilities along
with applicable interest and penalty once all documents are
submitted and all liabilities quantified. The respondents’ has
no objection in unfreezing the bank account once the
petitioner pays all the liabilities.”
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel
appearing for the parties, the present writ petition is disposed of with the
following directions.
(i)
The petitioner is directed to submit all the required documents to
the respondents within one week from today and thereafter to
cooperate with the investigation;
(ii)
As and when the petitioner submitted the required documents,
the respondents should promptly took up and complete the
process for quantification of the liabilities due payable by the
petitioners as taxes as early as possible but not later than two
weeks from the date of submission of the required documents
by the petitioner. It is also made clear that the petitioner should
cooperate with the investigation;
(iii) As soon as the process for quantification of the liabilities of the
petitioner is completed, the respondents are at liberty to initiate
the process for recovery of the taxes due payable by the
petitioner in terms of the applicable laws and the respondents
should unfreeze the Bank Account of the petitioner; and
(iv) It is further made clear that if for any reason, the respondents
could not co