Back
HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
A. GUNESHWAR SHARMA, J
Khulem Nishant Singh – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court acknowledges representation from all parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. prior petition highlighted procedural issues in seat application. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. comparison of neet scores establishes petitioner's eligibility for the seat. (Para 6 , 10) |
| 4. court resolves the petition allowing allotment based on merit. (Para 11) |
Order
25.08.2025 [1] This matter is taken up as unlisted item on mention in supplementary.
[2] Heard Mrs. Th. Babita, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Y. Ashang, learned G.A. assisted by Mr. Robert, learned counsel for the State respondent and Ms. L. Kamei, learned counsel for the Union of India.
[3] The petitioner earlier approached this Court by way of WP(C) No. 620 of 2025 for allowing him to mark the option for applying in Management Seat in SAHS. Due to miscommunication, he could not tick the relevant portion even though he has already ticked for Government Seat in RIMS, JNIMS and CMC.
[4] Vide order dated 12.08.2025, this Court allowed the petitioner to be considered for Management Seat under SAHS and observed in para 16 of the order dated 12.08.2025 that the admission of the petitioner in Management Seat should be done in terms of the prescri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
