Back
M.V. Muralidaran, J
Shri Konsam Poirei @ Inaoton Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Manipur – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fact summary of the prosecutrix's elopement and the resultant complaint. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 12 , 15) |
| 2. arguments regarding consent and allegations of misrepresentation. (Para 4 , 5 , 18) |
| 3. analysis of evidence and delays in appeal affecting suspension of sentence. (Para 10 , 11 , 19 , 21 , 26) |
| 4. court's reasoning to suspend the sentence based on appeal merits. (Para 20 , 27) |
| 5. final order on suspension of sentence pending appeal. (Para 28) |
JUDGMENT & ORDER (CAV)
[1] This application for suspension of sentence has been preferred by the petitioner-appellant for suspending the sentence awarded to him by the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) for Crime against Women, Manipur, vide its order dated 13.5.2019 passed in Sessions Trial (CAW) Case no. 15 of 2017, whereby the trial Court has convicted the petitioner-appellant for the offences punishable under Sections 417 and 376 IPC as under:
(a) 6 (six) months simple Imprisonment for the offence u/s 417 IPC .
(b) 10 years rigorous imprisonment for the offence u/s 376 IPC and to pay fine of Rs. 10,000/-, in default to undergo 6 months simple imprisonment.
[2] As per the prosecution story, the prosecutrix had lodged a written report
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
