HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
Mutum Ranjan Meitei – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate Thoubal District and 3 others – Respondent
W.P.(Crl.) 34 / 2025
##PAGE1##
Digitally signed by
KHOIROM
KHOIROM
BIPINCHANBIPINCHANDRA
SINGH
Item No. 5
DRA SINGHDate: 2026.02.12
15:52:31 +05'30'
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
AT IMPHAL
W.P.(CRL) No. 34 of 2025
Mutum Ranjan Meitei @ Lamjingba, aged about 21
years, S/o M. Deban Meitei, resident of Yairipok
Chandrakhong Mamang Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Yairipok,
Thoubal District, Manipur.
… Petitioner
- Versus -
1. District Magistrate, Thoubal District, DC office
Complex, P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, District :Thoubal, Manipur
– 795138.
2. The State of Manipur represented by
Commissioner/Secretary (Home), Government of
Manipur, Manipur Secretariat, North block, P.O. & PS.
Imphal, District Imphal West, Manipur – 795001.
3. The Union of India represented by Secretary
(Home), Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, North
Block, New Delhi – 110 001.
4. The Superintendent, Manipur Central Jail, Sajiwa,
P.O. Lamlong, P.S. Porompat : Imphal East, Manipur –
795114.
… Respondents
B E F O R E
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. BIMOL SINGH
For the petitioner : Mr. L. Shashibhushan, Senior Advocate
Instructed by Md. Fakhruddin, Advocate
For the respondents : Mr. Th. Vashum, Government Advocate for
R-1, R-2 & R-4
Mr. Boboy Potsangbam, CGC for R-3
Date of hearing : 11.02.2026
Date of order : 11.02.2026
Page 1 | 16
##PAGE2##JUDGMENT & ORDER
(O R A L)
[M. Sundar, CJ]
[1] Captioned writ petition (WP) has been filed assailing a
preventive detention order dated 20.05.2025 bearing reference No. Cril.
NSA Case No. 4 of 2025 made by R-1 (District Magistrate, Thoubal
District). Captioned WP is a habeas corpus plea. To be noted, ‘R-1’ is an
abbreviation denoting ‘first respondent’ and similar abbreviation/s will
be used with regard to other respondent/s also. This preventive
detention order made by R-1 shall be referred to as ‘impugned
preventive detention order’, R-1 shall be referred to as ‘detaining
authority’.
[2] Factual matrix in a nutshell is that the writ petitioner was
arrested on 17.04.2025 and an FIR was lodged on the same day, this
FIR dated 17.04.2025 bears No. 0076 and it is on the file of Thoubal
Police Station in Thoubal District, Manipur qua alleged offences under
Sections 17, 20 of ‘The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (37 of
1967)’ [‘UAPA’ for the sake of brevity] and Section 5 of Arms Act, 1959
(54 of 1959). The writ petitioner was produced before jurisdictional
Court i.e. Special Judge (NIA, Thoubal) and remanded to judicial
custody. While the writ petitioner remained incarcerated,
‘Superintendent of police, Thoubal’ who shall be referred to as
‘Sponsoring Authority’ sent 2 (two) communications, one dated
02.05.02025 and another dated 16.05.2026 bearing reference No.
Page 2 | 16
##PAGE3##9/37/2025/SP-TBL/2493 and No. 9/37/2025/SP-TBL/2728 respectively
requesting R-1 to make a detention order qua writ petitioner under the
‘National Security Act, 1980 (65 of 1980)’ [‘NSA’ for the sake of brevity].
Acting on these two communications from the sponsoring authority, R-
1 (detaining authority) made the impugned preventive detention order.
Thereafter, R-1 made grounds of detention dated 23.05.2025 bearing
No. Cril. NSA Case No. 4 of 2025 and this Court is informed that the
grounds of detention was served on the writ petitioner/detenu on the
same day (23.05.2025) in the Central Jail Sajiwa, Imphal East, Manipur
- 795114 where the detenu is now lodged.
[3] To capture facts which are necessary to appreciate this
order, this Court deems it appropriate to write that R-1 (detaining
authority) is an officer on whom powers have been conferred by the
State Government vide Section 3(3) of NSA. This means that the
impugned detention order made by R-1 shall remain in force only for 12
days but post 12 days it will operate subject to approval by State
Government. The State Government approved the impugned preventive
detention vide an order dated 31.05.2025 bearing reference No. H-
1401/5/2025-HD.HD. This means that the impugned preventive
detention order continued to operate beyond 12 days and to be noted,
it continues to oper
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.