SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Manipur) 102

HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
Mutum Ranjan Meitei – Appellant
Versus
District Magistrate Thoubal District and 3 others – Respondent
W.P.(Crl.) 34 / 2025



##PAGE1##

Digitally signed by

KHOIROM

KHOIROM

BIPINCHANBIPINCHANDRA

SINGH

Item No. 5

DRA SINGHDate: 2026.02.12

15:52:31 +05'30'

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

W.P.(CRL) No. 34 of 2025

Mutum Ranjan Meitei @ Lamjingba, aged about 21

years, S/o M. Deban Meitei, resident of Yairipok

Chandrakhong Mamang Leikai, P.O. & P.S. Yairipok,

Thoubal District, Manipur.

… Petitioner

- Versus -

1. District Magistrate, Thoubal District, DC office

Complex, P.O. & P.S. Thoubal, District :Thoubal, Manipur

– 795138.

2. The State of Manipur represented by

Commissioner/Secretary (Home), Government of

Manipur, Manipur Secretariat, North block, P.O. & PS.

Imphal, District Imphal West, Manipur – 795001.

3. The Union of India represented by Secretary

(Home), Govt. of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, North

Block, New Delhi – 110 001.

4. The Superintendent, Manipur Central Jail, Sajiwa,

P.O. Lamlong, P.S. Porompat : Imphal East, Manipur –

795114.

… Respondents

B E F O R E

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. M. SUNDAR

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A. BIMOL SINGH

For the petitioner : Mr. L. Shashibhushan, Senior Advocate

Instructed by Md. Fakhruddin, Advocate

For the respondents : Mr. Th. Vashum, Government Advocate for

R-1, R-2 & R-4

Mr. Boboy Potsangbam, CGC for R-3

Date of hearing : 11.02.2026

Date of order : 11.02.2026

Page 1 | 16

##PAGE2##

JUDGMENT & ORDER

(O R A L)

[M. Sundar, CJ]

[1] Captioned writ petition (WP) has been filed assailing a

preventive detention order dated 20.05.2025 bearing reference No. Cril.

NSA Case No. 4 of 2025 made by R-1 (District Magistrate, Thoubal

District). Captioned WP is a habeas corpus plea. To be noted, ‘R-1’ is an

abbreviation denoting ‘first respondent’ and similar abbreviation/s will

be used with regard to other respondent/s also. This preventive

detention order made by R-1 shall be referred to as ‘impugned

preventive detention order’, R-1 shall be referred to as ‘detaining

authority’.

[2] Factual matrix in a nutshell is that the writ petitioner was

arrested on 17.04.2025 and an FIR was lodged on the same day, this

FIR dated 17.04.2025 bears No. 0076 and it is on the file of Thoubal

Police Station in Thoubal District, Manipur qua alleged offences under

Sections 17, 20 of ‘The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (37 of

1967)’ [‘UAPA’ for the sake of brevity] and Section 5 of Arms Act, 1959

(54 of 1959). The writ petitioner was produced before jurisdictional

Court i.e. Special Judge (NIA, Thoubal) and remanded to judicial

custody. While the writ petitioner remained incarcerated,

‘Superintendent of police, Thoubal’ who shall be referred to as

‘Sponsoring Authority’ sent 2 (two) communications, one dated

02.05.02025 and another dated 16.05.2026 bearing reference No.

Page 2 | 16

##PAGE3##

9/37/2025/SP-TBL/2493 and No. 9/37/2025/SP-TBL/2728 respectively

requesting R-1 to make a detention order qua writ petitioner under the

‘National Security Act, 1980 (65 of 1980)’ [‘NSA’ for the sake of brevity].

Acting on these two communications from the sponsoring authority, R-

1 (detaining authority) made the impugned preventive detention order.

Thereafter, R-1 made grounds of detention dated 23.05.2025 bearing

No. Cril. NSA Case No. 4 of 2025 and this Court is informed that the

grounds of detention was served on the writ petitioner/detenu on the

same day (23.05.2025) in the Central Jail Sajiwa, Imphal East, Manipur

- 795114 where the detenu is now lodged.

[3] To capture facts which are necessary to appreciate this

order, this Court deems it appropriate to write that R-1 (detaining

authority) is an officer on whom powers have been conferred by the

State Government vide Section 3(3) of NSA. This means that the

impugned detention order made by R-1 shall remain in force only for 12

days but post 12 days it will operate subject to approval by State

Government. The State Government approved the impugned preventive

detention vide an order dated 31.05.2025 bearing reference No. H-

1401/5/2025-HD.HD. This means that the impugned preventive

detention order continued to operate beyond 12 days and to be noted,

it continues to oper

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top