Back
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, J
LAKYNTIEWRISHA NONGRUM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. fir lodged regarding contraband (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. defense argues against possession (Para 6) |
| 3. court considers evidence for trial (Para 12) |
| 4. presumption requires proof of recovery (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. bail granted with conditions (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
COMMON ORDER (ORAL)
1. These batch of bail applications involving similar and identical facts and questions are proposed to be disposed of by this common order.
2. Heard Mr. R. Gurung, learned counsel for the petitioners, who has submitted that an FIR dated 02.05.2023 was lodged before the Officer-in-Charge, Nongpoh Police Station, Ri-Bhoi District, wherein the informant, who is a police official of the Byrnihat Outpost, Ri-Bhoi District has stated that on 01.05.2023, at about 7:30 pm, on receipt of reliable information, a Naka checking was conducted and accordingly, one vehicle (Local Taxi) bearing registration No. ML 10 C 4908 was intercepted at Umling check gate.
3. On a search and seizure being made, the alleged contraband substance was found from the dashboard of the said Local Taxi, wherein four persons who are said to be passengers of the Local Taxi are suspected to be in possession of the contraband substance which
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
