Back
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, J
Smt. Supiya Khatun – Appellant
Versus
State Of Meghalaya and 6 ors – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. order issued for headmistress (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. historical background of the school (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner appointed as head teacher (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. petitioner's argument on demotion (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. violation of natural justice (Para 15) |
| 6. claim of direct recruitment (Para 16) |
| 7. delay and laches principle (Para 17) |
| 8. state respondent's justification (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. inquiry process flaws (Para 35) |
| 10. natural justice not followed (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41) |
JUDGMENT
1. Vide order dated 24.10.2016 issued by the Joint District Mission Coordinator, Dadenggre, West Garo Hills through Memo No. JDMC- D/SSA/APPROVAL/2016/672 the respondent No. 7/Smti. Oleda Sheikh was approved as the Headmistress of Tillapara Girls SSA LP School and the petitioner herein was directed to immediately hand over all the charges to the approved Headmistress, that is, the respondent No. 7 herein.
2. Being thus aggrieved with the order passed, the petitioner has now approached this Court with an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking enforcement of her fundamenta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
