Back
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
H.S.Thangkhiew, J
Gouranga Debbarma Sub (GD) – Appellant
Versus
The Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's grounds for appeal against acr grading. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding non-communication of grades. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's considerations of performance criteria. (Para 5) |
| 4. court's directive for reconsideration of the petitioner's representation. (Para 7) |
| 5. conclusion on the order and directions issued. (Para 8) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
1. The writ petitioner being aggrieved with a speaking order dated 30- 11-2023, passed by the respondents in pursuance to a judgment and order of this Court dated 24-08-2023, in WP(C). No. 293 of 2022, is before this Court assailing the same on the following grounds:
(i) The first ground is that though the representation of the writ petitioner was confined only to the relevant years of 2016- 2017, the respondents in refusing to upgrade the ACR, had referred to the years 2006-2007, which are not to be taken into consideration.
(ii) The second ground taken is that the Initiating Officer (IO) and the Reviewing Officer (RO), were the same persons who in the earlier assessment of 2015-2016 and subsequent 2016-2017 are the same and that the downgrading was without any explanation or reason.
2. The case of the writ petition
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
