HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
SKING RYMBAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MEGHALAYA – Respondent
Crl.A. 26 / 2023
##PAGE1##
2026:MLHC:7
Serial No. 01
Supplementary List
HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
AT SHILLONG
Date of Hearing: 02.12.2025
Crl.A.No.26 of 2023 Date of Decision: 28.01.2026
Shri. Sking Rymbai,
S/o Smti. Mil Rymbai,
R/o Village: Pasyih Dongmihsngi
P.S. Jowai
District: West Jaintia Hills Meghalaya.
Presently lodged in District Prison & Correctional Home,
West Jaintia Hills District, Jowai.
….. Appellant
-VERSUS-
State of Meghalaya
through Public Prosecutor
….. Respondent
Coram:
Hon’ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee, Judge
Appearance:
For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : Mr. M. Sharma, Legal Aid Counsel with
Ms. T. Buam, Adv
For the Respondent(s) : Mr. S.A. Sheikh, GA with
Ms. S. Shyam, GA
JUDGMENT AND ORDER
1. This appeal is directed against the impugned Judgment of conviction
dated 16.08.2022 and Order of Sentence of even date passed by the learned
Sessions Judge, West Jaintia Hills District, Jowai, in Sessions Case No.63 of
2014 convicting the appellant u/s 376/506 (Part II) IPC and sentencing him
Page 1 of 16
##PAGE2##2026:MLHC:7
to undergo 7 years imprisonment with fine of Rs.15,000/- and in default of
payment, to undergo further 2 months simple imprisonment.
2. The fact of the case, as can be derived from the record, is that on
12.08.2012, PW-1 lodged a written FIR to the In-Charge, Phramer Traffic
Cell to the effect that on 09.07.2012 at about 8:00 PM, the appellant came to
her resident at Pasyih Dongmihsngi while she was not at home and raped her
daughter, the survivor (17 years of age), while she was asleep. After
committing the act, the appellant warned and threatened to kill the survivor
if she disclosed the matter to anyone. The said FIR was then forwarded to
Jowai Police Station and registered as Jowai P.S. C/No.108 (8) 12 u/s 376
IPC and endorsed to a Women Police Sub-Inspector (WPSI) for
investigation. Upon completion of the investigation, a prima facie case was
found established against the appellant and accordingly, a charge-sheet was
submitted vide C/S No.174/13 dated 20.12.2013 u/s 376/506 IPC. The
matter was thereafter taken up as Sessions Case No.63/2014 and the
appellant was made to face the trial.
3. On 22.07.2015, the charge was framed by the Trial Court against the
appellant u/s 376/506 IPC to which the appellant pleaded not guilty and
claimed to be tried. During the course of the trial, the prosecution examined
7(seven) witnesses and exhibited 4(four) documents in support of its case.
After the completion of the prosecution evidence, the statement of the
appellant was recorded u/s 313 CrPC on 08.02.2022 in Pnar language
through an interpreter in presence of the defence counsel. No defence
witness was adduced on behalf of the appellant. The learned Trial Court
after hearing the parties, convicted the appellant by the impugned Judgment
dated 16.08.2022 u/s 376/506 IPC and by the Order of Sentence of even
date, sentenced the appellant to undergo imprisonment for 7 years with fine
of Rs.15,000/- for offence u/s 376 IPC and in default of payment of fine, the
appellant was ordered to undergo further 2 months simple imprisonment. In
addition, the appellant was also sentenced to imprisonment for 5 years u/s
Page 2 of 16
##PAGE3##2026:MLHC:7
506 (Para II) IPC. Both the sentences were to run concurrently.
4. Assailing the conviction and sentence, Mr. M. Sharma, learned LAC
appearing for the appellant submits that there was a delay of 33 days in filing
the FIR which remained unexplained during the trial making the entire
prosecution case doubtful. He submits that the evidence of PW-1(informant)
shows that she came to know about the incident after nine days of the
occurrence, but does not throw any light as to the entire period of delay in
lodging the FIR. He submits that there is also glaring discrepancy and
contradiction in the statement of the survivor recorded u/s 164 CrPC and her
deposition before the Trial Court. He submits that the survivor’s statement
u/s 164 CrPC reveals that her siblings were sleeping in another room and did
not hear the appellant’s entry into the house whereas, in her
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.