HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA AT SHILLONG
W. Diengdoh, B. Bhattacharjee, JJ
SALSRANG D. SANGMA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. – Respondent
Crl.M.C. No. 107 of 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for condonation of delay based on financial inability to engage counsel. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. judicial discretion to condone delay upon satisfaction of sufficient cause and lack of opposition. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
Serial No. 01
Regular List
i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.:
ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No
ORDER (ORAL)
1. Mr. R. Pahsyntiew, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that this instant application has been filed with a prayer for condonation of delay of 231 days in filing the related appeal, the ground being that the applicant/appellant on being convicted by the court of the learned Special Judge (POCSO), West Garo Hills District, Tura, in Special POCSO Case No. 28 of 2020 could not approach this Court within the stipulated period due to financial constraint and finally after exhausting all means was able to engage a counsel which is done so now. It is prayed that this application may be allowed, delay of 231 days may be condoned.
2. Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, learned GA appears for the State respondent and has no objection to the prayer of the applicant.
3. We have considered the submission and on perusal of the pleadings made in this application, this Court is persuaded to allow the prayer made. The delay as stated is hereby condoned.
4. Accordingly, the delay of 231 days in preferring the related appeal is hereby condoned.
5. Registry to diarize the appeal and list the same for admission after 1(one) week.
6. Crl. Misc. Case is disposed of.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.