HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Vijay Kumar Jain – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Champa Bai Agrawal – Respondent
was set-aside.
2.
learned trial Court. The Respondents filed a suit for eviction under section 12(1)(a) and 12(1)(f) (for arrears of rent and bonafide requirement). The learned trial Court dismissed the civil suit in its entirety. The Respondents preferred a first appeal in which the impugned order was passed. The impugned order upholds the order passed by the learned trial Court to the extent that it also did not accede to the prayers of the Respondents herein for a decree under section 12(1)(a) of the MP Accommodation Control Act, 1961. However, the Appellate Court allowed the appeal and passed a decree of eviction on the grounds of reasonable cause having been made out under section 12(1)(f) of the Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1961"). The Respondents herein have not preferred an appeal against the impugned order for the rejection of their appeal viz-a-viz section 12(1)(a) of the Act of 1961.
3.
Appellate Court erred in not following the law re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.