HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
VIVEK RUSIA, ANIL VERMA, JJ
Nandkishore – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Since both these appeals have been filed against the common impugned judgment, therefore, they are being decided by this common judgment.
1. Appellants have preferred both the Criminal Appeals under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short “ Cr.P.C .”) against the impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 27.11.2015 passed by the 3rd ASJ, Dewas (M.P.) in S.T. No.181/2013. The appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:-
2. The prosecution story, in brief, is that marriage of the appellant Vikas was solemnized with Swati (deceased) on 21.4.2008 in the group marriage ceremony (lEesyu) in presence of all the relatives of both the sides. After 2-3 months deceased was harassed by her husband, mother- in-law, father-in-law and sisters-in-law for bringing less dowry. She
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.