SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 1705

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Smt. Brijbala Soni – Appellant
Versus
M.S Rsd Developers Pvt. Through Its Director Smt. Prachi Daga – Respondent


Advocates:
Vijay Kumar Asudani,

This appeal has been filed by the appellants being aggrieved by the orderdated 06.05.2023 passed by leaned 11th District Judge, Indore in RCS.No.313- A/2023 whereby the trial Court dismissed the application filed by the appellants/plaintiffs under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC.

2. The brief facts of the case is that appellants/plaintiffs filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction thereby stating that they hv become heowner of he suit property vide registered sale deed dated 31.03.2021 whereinthe share of the plaintiffs was 62.5% and that of defendant was 37.5% but the defendant are trying to sale the property the plaintiffs were forced to file the suitin question. The plaint is Annexure-B. With the suit, the plaintiffs filed an application for temporary injunction Annexure-C for not alienating the suit property till disposal of the suit.

3. Respondent/defendant filed a reply to the application for grant of temporary injunction and along with the reply, respondent filed two unregistered and unstamped relinquishment deeds which were allegedly signed by plaintiff no.2 only and as per which the share of plaintiffs in the suit property was relinquished in favour of defend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top