ORDER

The petitioner submits that he has been authorized by petitioner no.2 to argue the matter being his wife.

2. Learned counsel for the respondent no.3 submits that due to inadvertence the name of Shri Kushagra Jain has been mentioned in the order dated 13.02.2025, in fact, the respondent no.3 is being represented by Shri Kushagra Singh and vakalatnama will be filed during the course of the day.

3. The present petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by defendants nos.1 and 2 challenging the order dated 25.04.2023 passed by 4th Additional District Judge, Indore in Civil Suit No.7-A/2014, whereby, the application for amendment under Order 6 Rule 17 of CPC in the WS has been rejected.

4. The respondent nos.1 and 2 has filed a civil suit for specific performance of contract. The defendant/petitioners filed their WS and thereafter, an amendment was made by the plaintiff which was allowed. Thereafter, the petitioners also filed an amendment in the WS, which was allowed. After the amendment was allowed in the WS the issues were framed. Then the petitioners filed another application for amendment in WS stating that further explanation is required. The said applica