SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(MP) 2525

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT, CJ, SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN, J
M.P. Bhoj Open University – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Anushka M. Nayak – Respondent


Advocates:
Krishna Keshav Singh,

JUDGMENT

Per: Hon'ble Shri Justice Vivek Jain.

The present batch of writ appeals have been filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh and by the M.P. Bhoj (Open) University challenging the common judgment and order passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No.1910/2017 and batch of connected cases on 02.04.2018. By the aforesaid order, the learned Single Judge has allowed the writ petitions filed by the selected candidates against which the State Government and M.P. Bhoj Open University (for short referred to as ‘University’) are in appeal before this Court.

2. As there is similarity of facts and common dispute is involved in the aforesaid appeals therefore, they are being decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience facts are being taken from WA No.36/2019.

3. It is argued by Ms. Shohba Menon, Sr. Advocate appearing on behalf of the University and Shri Amit Seth, learned Additional Advocate General and Shri Anubhav Jain, Govt. Advocate appearing on behalf the State Government that the order passed by the learned Single Judge is vulnerable in as much as learned Single Judge has not taken into account the provisions of the M.P. Bhoj (Open) University Adhiniyam, 1991 (for short re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top