SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 7821

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA, J
Rahul – Appellant
Versus
Sugna – Respondent


Advocates:
Amit Bhatia,

ORDER

The present petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India being aggrieved by the order dated 22.07.2024 passed by Civil Judge, Senior Division Sendhwa District Barwani, by which the application filed by the petitioner/defendant under Order 16 Rule 1 of CPC has been rejected.

The facts of the case is that the respondent/ Plaintiff filed a Civil Suit against the petitioner/Defendant and the same is pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Sendhwa, District - Barwani (M.P.), vide Case No. RCSB : 10/2023 for Recovery of Money.

During the Pendency of the suit the Plaintiff led evidence and closed the same. The suit was fixed for Evidence of Defendant. On 18.07.2024 after the Defendant’s evidence, the Petitioner/Defendant preferred an application under Order 16 Rule 01 of the C.P.C. The said application were replied by the Respondent/Plaintiff. By the impugned order, the said application has been rejected.

Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the plaintiff has filed a suit for money decree. It is submitted that the amount which is being claimed has already been paid to the plaintiff and in order to prove the aforesaid fact, he has filed an application t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top