HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Raghunath Sahu – Appellant
Versus
Smt. Sapna Nahar Thru. Power Of Attorney Shri Nemichand Bothra – Respondent
ORDER
Both the parties are present in person and have been duly identified by their respective counsel.
Heard on IA No. 19063/2023, an application under Section 482 of CrPC.
For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed.
Also heard on IA No. 8533/2019, an application for withdrawal of money from the Trial Court.
For the reasons, stated in the application, the same is allowed.
The applicant is permitted to do so in accordance with law.
Present revision has been filed against judgment dated 30.11.2015 passed b y Third Additional Sessions Judge, District Indore in Criminal Appeal No.106/2014 whereby learned Sessions Court affirmed the order dated 05.01.2014, passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, District-Indore in Criminal case No.34713/2006 wherein the applicant has been convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and sentenced him to undergo 6 month rigorous imprisonment and compensation of Rs.4,97,500/-. 2.Parties are present in person and have been duly identified by their respective counsel.
4. Learned counsel for both the parties submitted that the dispute has been settled amicably and the respondent has submitted that she has
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.