SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(MP) 5070

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Sanju – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Manoj Saxena,A.G.

J U D G E M E N T

Heard finally.

2. This judgement shall govern the disposal of Criminal Appeal No.1611 of 2013 filed by appellant Vikram S/o Ramchandra, Criminal Appeal No.1613 of 2013 filed by appellant Sanju S/o Mithulal and Criminal Appeal No.1615 of 2013 filed by appellants Pappu S/o Mithulal, Vishnu S/o Mithulal and Mansingh S/o Govind Bagri (since dead during the pendency of appeal and as per order dated 15.12.2015, appeal against him has already abated). All these three appeals have arisen out of the judgement dated 19.11.2013, passed in S.T. No.292/2010 by IVth A.S.J., Ujjain whereby finding the appellants guilty, the learned Judge of the trial Court has convicted them as under:-

Conviction Sentence
Section Act Imprisonment Fine Imprisonment in lieu of Fine
147 IPC 1 year R.I. - -
302 read with Section 149 IPC Life imprisonment Rs.1,000/- 1 year R.I.
307 read with Section 149 IPC 5 years R.I. Rs.500/- 6 months R.I.

3. In brief, the facts of the case are that complainant Laxminarayan (PW-4), his brother Madan (Pw-8), Ganesh and the deceased Ashok are the brothers and the deceased Ashok used to reside with his wife and children in village Juna Somwariya and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top