HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE PREM NARAYAN SINGH, J
Shalini Nahata – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
With consent of the parties heard finally.
Invoking the revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C., the petitioner has preferred this revision against the order of framing charges dated 31.07.2023 passed by the Thirteenth Additional Sessions/Special Judge (POCSO) Act, District Indore in S.T. No.339/2023 whereby learned Sessions Judge framed charges for offence under Section 75, 79 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 r/w Section 370 of of IPC , 1860 against the petitioners.
2. Prosecution story in brief is that on 06.10.2024 Child Welfare Committee rescued one child named Shivam from the residence of the petitioners. It was alleged that the child was working as a domestic servant at the residence of the Petitioners and even on small/petty mistake the petitioners used to beat Shivam and some times he was not provided with food on time.
On the basis of which Child Welfare Committee arrived at the finding that prima facie offence under Section 75 & 79 of Juvenile Justice Act, 2015 r/w Section 370 of IPC is made out against the petitioners. The Child Welfare Committee vide email dated 08.10.2021 communicated this incident to respondent and FIR bearing C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.