SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 31913

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
Nainasee Verma – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Arvind Kumar Pathak,Advocate General

ORDER

Petitioner is aggrieved of order dated 11.3.2024 passed by learned Commissioner, Sagar Division, Sagar in Appeal No.134/Appeal/2023-24 (Smt.Pragati Ahirwar versus Smt.Nainsee Verma & Others) whereby the learned Commissioner has set aside the order of the Additional Collector on the basis of the Samagra I.D & the B.P.L Card and has held the appellant Smt.Pragati Ahirwar to be the resident of Ward No.7 of Harijan Basti. Vide Annexure P/1 dated 15.3.2021, the Project Officer, Integrated Child Development Project (Rural), Tikamgarh had issued an advertisement for appointment of the Aganwadi Karyakarta for different places, which included the Nagar Panchayat Badagaon, Dhasan Ward No.7. Both the petitioner and the private respondent were candidates of the said selection.

It is not in dispute that the private respondent had secured more marks then the petitioner. However, the petitioner had raised an objection with regard to the place of residence of the private respondent and in support, had filed copy of the voter information enclosed alongwith this writ petition as Annexure P/15 in which name of the private respondent Smt.Pragati Ahirwar is mentioned at Serial No.61 with Electio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top