ORDER

This is the first criminal appeal filed by the appellant under Section 14(A) ( 2 ) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act for grant of bail relating to FIR No. 434 of 2023 registered atPolice Station Jhansi Road, District Gwalior (M.P.) for the offence under Sections 306, 420, 120-B and 34 of IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

The allegation against the present appellant - accused is that received money amounting to Rs.9,60,000/- from deceased Rajendra on account of false promise of employment and for selling the land to him, however, appellant - accused did not fulfill his promise on account of which deceased committed suicide.

Learned counsel for the appellant argued that the appellant is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is no evidence on record toshow that Rs.9,60,000/- was taken by the present appellant. Before his death, deceased Rajendra never lodged any report in any police station regarding alleged harassment by the present appellant. Even if the whole case of the prosecution is found to be true, there is no ingredient to show that appellant instigated the deceased to commit suicide. It is further submitted that appellantis in custody since 08.9.2023. It is further argued that the co-accused namely, Kalu Goswami and Sonu Goswami have already been granted the benefit of bailb y this Court vide order 04/10/2023, 10/10/2023 passed in Cr.A.No.12166/2023, Cra.No.12844/2023 respectively and the case of presentappellant is on better footing than the co-accused. persons. The appellant is thepermanent resident of District Gwalior (M.P.) and there is no possibility of his absconsion or tampering with the prosecution evidence. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the appellant.

O n the other hand, learned State counsel as well as counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the appeal by citing criminal antecedents of appellant and prayed for dismissal of present appeal.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without commenting upon the merits of the case, this appeal stands allowed and it is (SUNITA YADAV) JUDGE directed that the appellant be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond inthe sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh only) with one solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court.

This order will remain operative subject to compliance of the following conditions by the appellant:-

1. The appellant will comply with all the terms and conditions of the bond executed by him;

2. The appellant will cooperate in the investigation/trial, as the case may be;

3. The appellant will not indulge himself in extending inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to the Police Officer, as the case may be;

4. The appellant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused;

5. The appellant will not seek unnecessary adjournments during the trial; and

6. The appellant will not leave India without previous permission of the trial Court/Investigating Officer, as the case may be.

(7) The appellant shall mark his attendance before the SHO of the concerning police station in the first week of every month till conclusion of trial. A copy of this order be sent to the Court concerned for compliance.

C.C. as per rules. vpn