Back
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT, CJ, SHRI JUSTICE VIVEK JAIN, J
Satyam Pandey – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's arguments on performance (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. consideration of acrs (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 3. termination based on suitability (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 4. petition dismissed (Para 41 , 42) |
ORDER
Reserved on : 21.01.2025
Pronounced on : 31.01.2025
Per: Hon'ble Shri Justice Vivek Jain, Judge-
By way of present petition, the petitioner has called into question the order Annexure P-8 dated 24.07.2020 issued by the Principal Secretary, Department of Law and Legislative Affairs, Government of M.P., Bhopal, whereby the services of the petitioner, who was working as Judicial Officer on the post of Civil Judge Class - II (now designated as Civil Judge Junior Division) have been terminated in terms of Rule 11 (c) of M.P. Judicial Service (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1994 (for short hereinafter referred to as 'Rules 1994').
2. The aforesaid order has been issued mentioning that the petitioner was unable to complete the probation period satisfactorily and successfully and therefore, as per the decision of Administrative Committee of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
