SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(MP) 11564

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH
SHRI JUSTICE ANAND PATHAK, J
Geeta Devi – Appellant
Versus
Pawan Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Balwant Singh Kushwaha,

JUDGMENT

1. The present appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 is preferred by the appellants/defendants against the judgment and decree dated 18-05-2018 passed by the II Additional District Judge, Dabra District Gwalior in Civil Suit No.2-A/2013 whereby the suit has been decreed in favour of respondent No.1/plaintiff.

2. Precisely stated facts of the case for adjudication are that plaintiff (respondent No.1 herein), namely Pawan Kumar (minor through his mother Smt. Rajkumari) filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction in respect of agriculture land vide survey No.28/2 min area 0.677 hectare. Reliefs claimed in the suit are as under:

3. It was the pleadings of the plaintiff that he is having right, title,

ownership, interest and possession over the suit land. Plaintiff was part of Hindu United Family (HUF) in which his grandfather late Ramswaroop Kushwah was the Karta and out of the HUF property, his grandfather purchased the suit property vide registered sale deed

dated 16-03-2000 in the name of present plaintiff who was minor at the relevant point of time. After purchasing the suit property, name of plaintiff was recorded in the revenue records (Khas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top