Writ Petition No.7902/2020
- 1 -
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE
HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH, BENCH AT INDORE
Division Bench : HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. C. SHARMA AND
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
Writ Petition No.7902/2020
Mr. Akshay N. Patel
Versus
Reserve Bank of India and Another
Counsel for the
Parties
: Shri Abhinav Malhotra, learned counsel for the
petitioner.
Shri Bharat A. Chitale, learned counsel for the
respondent No.1.
Shri Milind Phadke, learned counsel for the
respondent No.2.
Whether approved for
reporting
: Yes
Law laid down
: (1) Ban of export in respect of KN95 Masks,
Personal Protective Equipment Kits and
other products does not amount to
violation of fundamental right guaranteed
under Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution
of India. Its a purely policy matter and the
Government of India does have the power
to frame Trade Policy in exercise of
powers conferred under the Foreign Trade
(Development & Regulation) Act, 1992.
(2) The Circular issued by Reserve Bank of
India dated 23/01/2020 in respect of
Merchanting Trade Transactions is not at
all violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the
Constitution of India and the Government
does have the power to regulate import /
export and to regulate Merchanting Trade
Transaction Contracts.
Significant paragraph
numbers
: 34 to 61
Niraj Shrivastava,Advocate General
(Delivered on this 08
th October, 2020)
- 2 -
The petitioner before this Court has filed this present petition
challenging the circular issued by the Reserve Bank of India dated
23/01/2020 which is in respect of Merchanting Trade Transactions
(MTT).
02-
The petitioner's contention is that the petitioner is an Indian
citizen and is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of
Pharmaceutical, Herbal, Skin Care and Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) products in India and several other countries. The
petitioner has further stated that Corona Virus has infected large
number of people over the entire globe and Personal Protective
Equipment (PPE) Kits, Masks and Ventilators are in acute shortage all
over the globe.
03-
The petitioner has further stated that as there was an acute
shortage of PPE Kits, Masks, Sanitizer, etc. and as some of the
countries were manufacturing more than the demand in their own
country, the petitioner wanted to supply the goods to United States of
America (USA).
04-
The petitioner has further stated that he has negotiated the
supply of PPE Kits and other goods with a buyer of United States of
America and he has placed an order for purchase of KN95 Masks
from a manufacturing Company based in China, meaning thereby, the
petitioner wanted to purchase the goods from China and to supply in
United States of America by exploiting the system of Merchanting
Trade Transactions which involves an Indian Bank as well as Reserve
- 3 -
Bank of India.
05-
The petitioner has further stated that under the Merchanting
Trade Transactions an Indian Citizen facilitates the export of any
goods or material from a Company or individual of an export country
(other than India) and then import / supply of the said goods to a
Company in another country, which is also other than India. Thus, in
short their contention is that goods are neither manufactured in India
nor imported to India at any point of time, however, the profit comes to
India in various currencies.
06-
The petitioner has further stated that Merchanting Trade
Transaction Contracts are regulated and governed by Reserve Bank
of India by issuing circulars from time to time and the Reserve Bank of
India in the year 2000 in exercise of its powers conferred under
Section 10(4) and Section 11(1) of the Foreign Exchange
Management Act, 1999 has issued a circular dated 24/08/2000 to
regulate any Merchanting Trade Transaction contract entered into by
any Indian national. The aforesaid circular was amended later on in
the year 2014 i.e. on 27/01/2014.
07-
The petitioner has further stated that on 23/01/2020 the
Reserve Bank of India has issued another notification dated
23/01/2020 and revised guidelines for
Merchanting Trade
Transactions have been issued superseding its earlier guidelines. The
petitioner's grievance is that Rule 2 Clause (iii) provides that MTT
shall be undertaken for the goods that are permitted for export / import
- 4 -
under the prevailing Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) as on the date of
shipment.
08-
The petitioner has further stated that after receiving the
Merchanting Trade Transaction contracts for supply of KN95 Masks
manufactured in China to the buyer based in United States of
America, the petitioner on 01/05/2020 contacted its banker for
execution of necessary international trade documents and requested
its bankers to open a Letter of Credit in favour of manufacturer /
supplier based in China.
09-
The petitioner has further stated that on 05/05/2020 the officials
of HDFC Bank wrote to the petitioner that at present on account of
spread of Corona Virus Disease, the Union of India through Director
General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) has prohibited export of PPE Kits,
Masks, Ventilators and Sanitizer from India and because Merchanting
Trade Transactions regulations dated 23/01/2020 as contained in
Clause 2(iii) which is in respect of the MTT contracts read with the
For