O R D E R

Considered I.A.No.7516/2024.

2. Before considering the aforesaid application, this Court would like to consider the reliefs claimed by the petitioner in the present case.

3. Clause 7 of the writ petition reads as under :- “7-1& 138 ds izdj.k] Jheku izFke Js.kh U;kf;d eSftLVªsV ckyk?kkV ds vafre vkn’s k izdj.k SCNIA 500621/16 dk s [kkfjt gks ldsA

7-2& ;fn ekuuh; U;k;ky; viuh Js"B cqf)eRrk l s ;fn vkSj Hkh dksbZ Js"B fu.kZ; nus k pkgs rks mlds fy, Hkh ge vkil s fouez fouarh djrs gSaA””

4. It appears that the father of the petitioner was tried for an offence under section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act and was convicted by order dated 26.9.2023 passed by the JMFC, Balaghat in SCNIA/500621/16. The complaint was filed against Vanganga Rice Mill as well as the father of the petitioner, who was the Proprietor of the aforesaid Mill. It appears that the father of petitioner has already approached the Sessions Court by filing a criminal appeal. The criminal appeal was filed by three persons; Vanganga Rice Mill, Maganlal Patel (father of the petitioner) as well as by the petitioner himself. By order dated 9.10.2023, the appellate court has refused to allow the petitioner to be implea